Cynthia Bascetta, director for
Health Care Issues in the
Government Accountability
Office, charged a lack of
coordination between the Agency
for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), and Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid (CMS), and further
claimed there was no one in the
Secretary of HHS' office in
charge of tracking HAIs.
Other key statements, charges
and proposals made during the
hearing included the following:
 |
The U.S. ranked last in
quality, access, efficiency
equity and outcomes compared
to other industrialized
nations listed in a recent
Commonwealth Fund report
|
 |
The federal government
spends $1 on biomedical
research; spends 1 penny on
quality health care delivery
|
 |
The AHRQ-funded project in
cooperation with Johns
Hopkins and the Michigan
Health and Hospital
Association in which CDC
guidelines were condensed
into a pilot checklist
resulted in the elimination
of 50% of ICU
catheter-related blood
stream infections, saving
1,800 lives and $2 million
over two years |
 |
Proposed increase funding
for medical research into
healthcare quality practices
|
 |
Create programs to train
more researchers in medical
research into healthcare
practices
|
 |
Transparency of healthcare
quality data, enabling
people to make informed
decisions |
 |
Alignment of payments with
quality |
 |
Eighty seven percent (87%)
of hospitals surveyed by the
Leapfrog Group do not take
recommended steps to prevent
infections |
Leapfrog called for federal
agencies to see HAIs as a
priority and tie payments to
positive outcomes, rewarding
hospitals for voluntary
efforts. Further, the agency
called for HHS to provide more
authority for value-based
purchasing.
HHS reported an AHRQ initiative
to mitigate infections at 72
hospitals, and stated that the
CDC is modifying its HICPAC
recommendations to address MRSA.
Dr. Peter Pronovost, medical
director, Center for Innovation
in Quality Patient Care, and
assistant profession for Johns
Hopkins' School of Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology and
Critical Care Medicine, said the
issue of HAIs should be
approached as a science, not an
art. He cited examples of
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
for which there are 30
false-positives for every
correct diagnosis, adding that
it is important to make things
simpler, e.g. providing a
checklist instead of 200 pages
of guidelines.
In response to questions from
Washington D.C. Delegate Eleanor
Holmes Norton, it was noted that
HHS is working with Walter Reed
Hospital to address the risks
associated with the treatment
for acinetobacter in soldiers.
Betsy McCaughey of the Committee
to Reduce Infection Deaths
(RID), charged a lack of
cleanliness in U.S. hospitals,
blaming the CDC as a result of
changes in the 1970's in which
there was no longer strict
oversight over the cleanliness
of hospitals. She claimed that
restaurant cleanliness standards
are far greater than those for
hospitals and called for
expanded reporting of 25 adverse
events as defined by the
National Quality Forum.
Dr. Pronovost called for the
same approach to HAIs as was
taken with polio, agreeing with
Congressman Paul Hodes that
addressing HAIs was "low-hanging
fruit" in healthcare reform.
Congressman Hodes asked the HHS
to consider eliminating silos
and to create the synergy needed
to move the HAI issue forward.
Congressman Timothy Murphy of
Pennsylvania, author of the
Healthy Hospitals Act, stressed
the importance of online
information regarding HAI data,
contrasting the ready access
consumers have to online
information on airline flight
schedules, to that of
information on HAI rates which
is more limited.
Congressman Murphy also asked
each witness whether there
needed to be federal action to
make information on HAIs
publicly available and whether
we should act quickly.
Witnesses responded in the
affirmative, but there were
comments that reporting needed
to be thoughtful and coupled
with funding on preventing
infections, rather than just
reporting on them.
The Department of Health and
Human Services has sixty days to
respond to the GAO report. In
the meantime, as Members of
Congress take action to respond
to the concerns of their
constituents, or to have a
positive action on healthcare
just prior to an election year,
APIC will reinforce the
importance of science-based
requirements that improve
patient health, rather than
legislation that produces sound
bites, with little corresponding
benefit to patients.
To access the
archived video of the hearing
click here.
Testimony from the Chairman and
all witnesses can be
accessed by clicking here.